Evidenced Based Management: A Journey for Physicians
-
Historical Perspective, Epidemiology, and Methodology
-
Overview of the SCD guidelines and chapters
-
Process and methodology
-
Consensus Statements
-
Clinical Practice Guidelines and the institute of Medicine
-
Prevention of invasive infection
-
Screening for Renal Disease
-
Electrocardiogram Screening
-
Screening for hypertension
-
Screening for Retinopathy
-
Screening for risk of stroke using neuroimaging
-
Screening for Pulmonary disease
-
Reproductive counseling
-
Contraception
-
Clinical Preventive services
-
Immunizations
-
Vaso-Occlusive Crisis
-
Fever
-
Acute Renal Failure
-
Priapism
-
Hepatobiliary Complications
-
Acute Anemia
-
Splenic Sequestration
-
Acute Chest Syndrome
-
Acute Stroke
-
Multisystem Organ Failure
-
Acute Ocular Conditions
-
Chronic pain
-
Avascular Necrosis
-
Leg Ulcers
-
Pulmonary Hypertension
-
Renal Complications
-
Stuttering/Recurrent Priapism
-
Ophthalmologic Complications
-
Summary of the Evidence
-
Hydroxurea Treatment Recommendations
-
Consensus Treatment Protocol and Technical remarks for the implementation of Hydroxyurea Therapy
-
Indications for transfusions
-
Recommendations for Acute and Chronic Transfusion Therapy
-
Appropriate Management/ Monitoring
-
Consensus Protocol for Monitoring Individuals on Chronic Transfusion Therapy
-
Complications of Transfusions
-
Recommendations for the Management and Prevention of Transfusion Complications
-
New Research is Needed
-
Data Systems That Meet the Highest Standards of Scientific Rigor Can Be Invaluable
-
Improved Phenotyping is needed
-
Broad collaborations for Research and Care
-
Beyond Efficacy
-
Look, Listen, Empathize and Ask
Participants 164
Perhaps the largest need is to translate the results of research that has been performed in laboratories and academic centers into community-based practice tools and clinical protocols. Such translational studies should lead to effectiveness trials. “Efficacy” does not always translate to “effectiveness.” One of the best examples is hydroxyurea. Although hydroxyurea has proven efficacious in RCTs, the majority of eligible persons with SCA in the United States do not yet receive this agent. Well-designed effectiveness and translational studies are needed to overcome the identified barriers that result in underutilization of hydroxyurea. These barriers include the limited number of physicians with knowledge and experience with the agent, and patients’ misconceptions and fears about side effects. Studies are also needed to examine the role of hydroxyurea in people with genotypes and clinical manifestations other than those in the MSH study. The SCD research community can make a real difference through comparative effectiveness research and other investigative strategies, as well as strengthening clinical and public health SCD collaborative efforts at the State and local levels. Finally, all of the research addressed in these guidelines cannot be successful for the approximately 70,000 to 100,000 individuals with SCD in the United States until sickle cell centers, practicing hematologists, and primary care providers in particular are fully willing and capable of taking on the challenges of serving these individuals and their families.
The expert panel realizes that these guidelines leave many uncertainties for health professionals caring for or planning to begin caring for individuals with SCD. However, we hope that these guidelines begin to facilitate improved and more accessible care for all individuals with SCD, and that the discrepancies in the data will trigger new research programs and processes that will provide the evidence necessary to expand upon evidence-based SCD guidelines in the future.